May 14, 2005
City Council 18 Months - Little Positive
The fanfare that greeted the installation of Mayor Francis and
his fellow members of council is just a memory. How we longed for
an era of reform with an end to the secrecy and mismanagement that
plunged us into a $200 million financial abyss. The removal of Hurst,
the changes to council and administration were heralded as the arrival
of responsible municipal governance. As events have unfolded we have
been disappointed.
A lower debt level has been cited as something of a triumph. The
truth is that debt containment has been accomplished largely with
major tax and fee increases. The bloated size and cost of administration
remains intact, resulting in excessively high service costs. Recent
examples of taxpayer rape are, the blanket application of excessive
business license fees and the use of comparisons with other municipalities
in Ontario to justify heavy increases in development charges. Just
looking for easy ways to increase revenue.
Secrecy still surrounds the Candarel scandal and
the financial bloodletting ($1.5 million annually) continues without
any sign of
relief. Council’s decision to embark on the construction of
a totally unnecessary bus depot downtown is another black mark. If
council really believes in the Schwartz Report that calls for an
integrated transport system, why waste $6 million on an unnecessary
downtown bus depot?
Millions of dollar overruns in the cost of the Security Building
is really no surprise.
A secret discussion and a vote to waste time on an arena public/private
partnership
is nothing less than an insult to hard pressed taxpayers.
Before the in-camera meeting, a public discussion should have been
initiated
to allow concerned citizens to question the necessity or affordability
of a new arena. The $15 million “nest egg” should be
utilized to repair our crumbling infrastructure not invested in a
speculative arena enterprise.
It feels like the “Good Old” Hurst days when taxpayers
were told to pay up and shut up. Further the “discovery” of
a $4.5 million surplus after the latest tax increase is absurd. Are
we to believe that city computers cannot do simple arithmetic?
There are some important underlying causes for this council’s disappointing
performance. Administration remains defiantly out of control and selective
as to which councilors receive service. A group of tax and spend councilors
appear to have joined forces in an effort to elect fellow political travelers
in the next election. They are failing in their obligation to the electorate
to manage the city’s affairs with total impartiality. These councilors
are certainly undermining the sterling efforts of the Mayor and non-partisan
councilors.
Windsor Utilities and the Enwin Companies belong
to the citizens yet their operations are never publicly discussed.
Millions of tax
dollars are being spent on unsuccessful commercial operations and
a public enquiry is essential. The disposition of the $32 million
transfer to the city’s coffers still needs explanation.
The Mayor’s annual state of the city address
was generally uninspiring and attendance at the Capitol was pathetic.
He must surely
see that taxpayers are becoming dissatisfied with overpriced services,
a continuing pervasive secrecy and continuing tax increases. There
are distinct signs that council is rapidly losing the support of
the electorate.
Rightly so!
Al Nelman
|